Case study · Professional services
Identity, devices and departures: putting a tax firm's security in writing and in practice
A bilingual tax and accounting practice in South Florida had grown into a team with laptops, cloud accounts and client files everywhere, managed informally. We turned that into a governed environment: one identity per person, managed devices with documented policies, an arrivals-and-departures procedure, and an inventory somebody can produce on request.
In numbers
1
identity per person, across mail, files, devices and chat
7
device policies tested, piloted and applied, each one documented
2
offices inventoried and drawn, network included
Who this is for
Owners and partners of professional-services firms, in tax, accounting, law or advisory, that hold client financial or identity data and have grown their technology informally. You will get the order of work that produces something an insurer, a regulator or a client can actually be shown, and the reason the inventory comes first.
Key takeaways
- The inventory is the deliverable most clients skip and the one everything else depends on.
- A policy should be enforced by the laptop, not requested by a memo. Devices join a single identity and a management platform so the rule applies itself.
- Arrivals and departures are one procedure, not a hunt through five tools.
- Test, pilot, roll out. Seven policies were proven on a virtual machine and a small group before touching the fleet.
- The remaining thirteen policies are the firm's decisions, not our defaults.
What does an informally grown practice actually look like?
What a tax practice holds
A tax practice holds the most sensitive thing a client owns after their health record: their finances, their identity numbers, their payroll. This firm had built a loyal bilingual client base in South Florida and a team to match. Its technology had grown the way it does in a busy practice: a website, a Microsoft tenant, Google Drive, a password shared here and there, laptops bought as people joined, and an IT relationship that answered the phone but didn't own the picture.
The three questions nobody could answer in a day
Nobody could say, in a day, which devices held client data, which accounts were still active for people who had left, or which security settings were actually applied rather than intended. For a business that files other people's returns, that isn't an IT gap. It's the gap an insurer, a regulator, or an attacker asks about first.
The brief was not “sell us security”
The firm's question was not “sell us security”. It was: what do we actually have, what should be true, and how do we prove it?
The inventory everyone skips
We began with an inventory: every user, every device, every application that touches client data, and the two office locations and their networks, drawn as diagrams the people running the firm can read. The inventory is the deliverable most clients skip and the one everything else depends on.
What should be true, and how do you write it down?
Then we decided what should be true, and wrote it down as policies that apply themselves. Devices would join a single identity and a management platform, so a policy is something the laptop enforces, not something a memo requests.
- One identity per person across Microsoft 365, with licences assigned by role and multi-factor authentication where client records move.
- A catalogue of twenty device policies across security, user experience, network and updates, of which seven were selected.
- Arrivals and departures as one procedure: create or block the identity, assign or wipe the device, remove access to shared drives and chat, keep the account for retention before deletion.
| Arrival | Departure | |
|---|---|---|
| Identity | Create it | Block it, keep it for retention, then delete it |
| Device | Assign it | Wipe it |
| Shared drives and chat | Give access | Remove access |
| Policies | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| Catalogued | 20 | Across security, user experience, network and updates |
| Selected | 7 | Tested on a virtual machine, piloted on a small group, applied to the whole fleet, each documented with its purpose and configuration |
| Remaining | 13 | Decisions the firm can make with the trade-offs in front of it, following the same path |
How were the policies rolled out?
The seven policies were tested on a virtual machine, piloted on a small group and then applied to the whole fleet. Each one is documented with its purpose and configuration.
Endpoint protection and mail signatures moved to central management, so the everyday tools stop being the weakest link.
The website work that had started the relationship years earlier continued alongside, in the same staging-and-production discipline: content in two languages published without anyone touching the live server by hand.
What can the firm prove now that it could not before?
The firm can now produce, on request, what it couldn't before: the list of devices and who holds them, the accounts and their status, the policies in force and the evidence that they are applied. A departure follows one procedure instead of a hunt through five tools.
The next change follows the same path: test, pilot, roll out. The remaining thirteen policies in the catalogue are decisions the firm can make with the trade-offs in front of it, not defaults we imposed.
This is the pattern our professional-services pages describe: an environment the firm can account for, item by item. The firm didn't buy a product to get there. It bought a picture of its own environment and a way of keeping it true.
Questions readers ask
Customer Success Team
Itaca Technologies
Your question isn't here?
Ask it as you'd ask it across the table. The team that does the work reads it and answers with a concrete next step.